|
COURT WATCH - Damage to Property
(1-4 of 4)
|
|
|
Sort By
|
|
Order by
|
Display
Results per page
|
|
|
|
Criticism | 3675/09 | 1.1.2012 | Adv. Yossi Wolfson
|
Criticism
The relationship between the Supreme Court of Israel and international law has had its share of ups and downs. The Supreme Court’s judgment in Daud, with the lead opinion written by Deputy President Eliezer Rivlin, marks one of the lowest points in this relationship. In a short paragraph at the end of the opinion, the court relegates international law to the status of outcast among the laws it ...
|
|
|
|
|
Criticism | 10356/02 | 1.12.2011 | Adv. Yossi Wolfson
|
Criticism
In one of the Israeli Supreme Court’s comprehensive judgments regarding the law applicable in the OPT, the court acknowledged the constitutional status of the human rights of residents of the OPT. In that same judgment, the High Court of Justice (HCJ) sanctioned the demolition of Palestinian houses in Hebron. The judgment was penned by Justice Procaccia with the consent of the then Supreme Cour...
|
|
|
|
|
Criticism | 8811/04 | 1.4.2010 | Adv. Yossi Wolfson
|
Criticism
Unit 202 of the Israeli military has a reputation as being a top operations unit. This is judicial knowledge; or so at least according to the judgment of Judge Malka Aviv at the Jerusalem Magistrates Court in the matter of Abu Snineh. I will confess: this author has no idea what Unit 202 is, or what reputation it has gained. Perhaps this is the root of the problem.The verdict concerns events th...
|
|
|
|
|
Criticism | 9717/03 | 1.1.2010 | Adv. Yossi Wolfson
|
Criticism
One of the most important rules in the laws of occupation is the prohibition on the occupying power to plunder the occupied territories and transfer its non-renewable resources to its own hands. The Israeli court reviewed this rule in a petition filed by residents of two settlements, Na’ale and Nili, against the establishment of a quarry in the Natuf valley nearby.The settlers were concerned ab...
|
|
|
|
|
|