Security Prisoner
Security Detainee
Administrative Detainee
Total

COURT WATCH - Separation Wall

(1-2 of 2)
Sort By Order by Display Results per page



The Permit Regime in the “Seam Zone”: HCJ 9961/03 HaMoked: Center for the Defence of the Individual v. Government of Israel et al., HCJ 639/04 The Association for Civil Rights in Israel v. IDF Commander in the Judea and Samaria Area et al. (judgment dated April 5, 2011)
Criticism  |  9961/03  |  1.6.2012  |  Adv. Keren Michaeli
Criticism
In April 2011, the High Court of Justice (HCJ) upheld the permit regime imposed by the military on the entry of Palestinians into the “seam zone” in the West Bank. The “seam zone” is an enclave that was created as a result of the fact that the separation wall was built inside the Occupied Palestinian Territory (OPT). The enclave has trapped some 7,000 Palestinian residents and some 120,000 dun...
The Legality of the Separation Wall: HCJ 7957/04 Mara’abe v. Prime Minister of Israel (Judgment of September 15, 2009)
Criticism  |  7957/04  |  1.4.2011  |  Adv. Yossi Wolfson
Criticism
The Mara’abe judgment, like many Supreme Court judgments in the past decade, reads partly as a judgment and partly as a statement of defense or a polemic. The judgment concerns the legality of the separation wall in the segment south of Qalqiliya. In this particular segment, the wall penetrates deep into the West Bank, surrounds Alfei Menashe and creates territorial contiguity between this sett...
mail@hamoked.org.il (02) 627 1698   (02) 627 6317

red-id | רד אינטראקטיב