Security Prisoner
Security Detainee
Administrative Detainee
Total

Administrative Law

(1-20 of 64)
  DOCUMENTS (64)     CASE SUMMARIES (1)  
Sort By Order by Display Results per page



2.11.2012
HaMoked to the Magistrates' Court: the fee demanded by the Ministry of Interior for handling application under the Freedom of Information Law is four times the fee stipulated by law
CMA 10235-09-12 – HaMoked: Center for the Defence of the Individual v. Ministry of Interior - Population, Immigration and Border Authority
Appeal   |  10235-09-12  |  2.9.2012
25.7.2012
Invitation to a pubilc event co-hosted by HaMoked and Bezalel Yaffo 23 Gallery, as part of HaMoked's "Court Watch" project
Invitation to a public event of HaMoked's "court watch" project
Other  |  17.7.2012
On tearing down walls, peace among nations and trains: HCJ 281/11 - Head of Beit Iksa Local Council et al. v. Minister of Defense et al. (judgment of September 6, 2011)
Criticism  |  281/11  |  30.5.2012  |  Adv. Yotam Ben Hillel
Criticism
In these times of diplomatic standstill, when the end to the Israeli occupation of the Palestinian territory seems as distant as ever, here are some heartwarming words, surprisingly, with respect to mass public transportation:[T]he utility of the railroad must be examined from a broad perspective in which the railroad is seen as a single component of an overall plan for a regional steel railway...
The status of West Bank property that belonged to Jews prior to 1948: HCJ 3036/03 Shlomo Valero v. State of Israel (judgment rendered February 6, 2011)
Criticism  |  3103/06   |  4.4.2012  |  Adv. Yotam Ben Hillel
Criticism
HCJ 3103/06 Sholomo Valero v. State of Israel concerns the fate of property in Hebron which was allegedly purchased by Moshe Valero, a Jewish man, in 1935. Valero passed away in 1945 and his property was divided between his three children. The petitioners in this case were two of his children and the heirs of the third. As is known, beginning in 1948, the West Bank was under the control of the...
12.3.2012
Leading Human Rights Organizations Petition the Israeli Supreme Court to Cancel the Anti-Boycott Law
Fighting Auto Theft in Israel – Mapp 4506/08 ‘Ajaj v. State of Israel (judgment dated May 1, 2008), MCrimApp 4343/08 ‘Ajaj v. State of Israel (judgment dated June 29, 2008)
Criticism  |  4506/08, 4343/08  |  19.12.2011  |  Adv. Yossi Wolfson
Criticism
One of the central tenets of the laws of occupation is that the discretion of the military commander of an occupied territory is constricted by two magnetic poles: the military needs of the occupying power on one hand and the interests of the population of the occupied territory on the other. The Supreme Court of Israel has ruled time and again that the military commander may not take the natio...
8.11.2011
In the wake of attacks and threats against activists and organizations: Joint statement by the civil society organizations in Israel
Suppression of Political Activity in the Occupied Territories: HCJ 660/88 “In’ash al-Usra Association” v. IDF Commander in the Judea and Samaria (judgment rendered October 11, 1989)
Criticism  |  660/88  |  2.10.2011
Criticism
Forced military rule naturally arouses political resistance among those it subjugates. Hence, it inherently involves suppressing the political life of the subjugated population. In fact, suppression or manipulation of the political life is a necessary condition for the survival of oppression. Though this is self-evident, it is odd to see how a court in a self-professed democracy implements it w...
2.10.2011
The Ministry of Interior, the nonexistent hearing, and the fake protocol
25.9.2011
The HCJ issues an order nisi in two of HaMoked's petitions, and clarifies: reliance on "classified material" requires a certificate of privilege
The Interpretation of the Geneva Convention by the Justices of the Supreme Court: HCJ 253/88 Sajdiya v. Minister of Defense (judgment rendered November 8, 1988)
Criticism  |  253/88   |  20.9.2011
Criticism
In the beginning of the first intifada, Israel conducted mass arrests in the Occupied Palestinian Territories (OPT). Many detainees were transferred to a special holding facility built far away in Qetziot, in the Negev desert.In the Sajdiya judgment,[1] the Supreme Court reviewed a number of issues relating to the prison camp. The court instructed the military to resolve the issue of severe ove...
Open-Fire Regulations: CivA 7995/02 Military Commander in the Judea and Samaria Area v. Sha’anubi (judgment rendered September 25, 2007)
Criticism  |  7995/02  |  10.9.2011
Criticism
It is commonly accepted that law enforcement agencies have the authority to use force in order to apprehend suspected offenders. This authority is far reaching: it does not concern self defense or stopping the commission of an offense, nor use of force in order to enforce a served judgment. This is a secondary power which is adjunct to the power to imprison an individual for the purpose of clar...
HCJ 281/11 - Head of Beit Iksa Local Council et al. v. Minister of Defense et al. Judgment
Verdict / Supreme Court  |  281/11  |  6.9.2011
Judgment in a petition to revoke an order for the expropriating lands for the purpose of building a railroad between Tel-Aviv and Jerusalem. The HCJ rejected the petition due to late submission. The Court ruled that while the expropriation undermined the rule of law, the harm done in these circumstances did not exceed the harm that would be caused to public interests were the petition accepted....
The IDF and Alleged International Law Violations Reforming Policies for Self-Investigation (Abstract)
Report  |  10.8.2011
Abstract taken from The Israel Democracy Institute website.(full report available in Hebrew)
13.7.2011
28 civil society organizations and activists: “the Wind Blowing in the Knesset Endangers Us All”
Law for Prevention of Damage to the State of Israel through Boycott (2011)
Law  |  11.7.2011
Translation from the website of Adalah.
Settlement with Impunity: HCJ 6492/08 S.H.A.’A.L. – Peace Now for Israel Educational Enterprises v. IDF Commander in the West Bank (judgment rendered January 14, 2009)
Criticism  |  6492/08  |  15.5.2011  |  Adv. Yossi Wolfson
Criticism
One of the important characteristics of occupation under international law is its temporariness. An occupying power is prohibited from introducing permanent changes in an occupied territory. Therefore, as far as the Supreme Court of Israel is concerned, all the changes Israel made in the Occupied Palestinian Territories (OPT) are only temporary: the settlements, the separation wall, the militar...
Citizenship Law (Amendment No. 10) 5771-2011
Law  |  4.4.2011
Taken from the website of Adalah.


mail@hamoked.org.il (02) 627 1698   (02) 627 6317

red-id | רד אינטראקטיב