|
|
|
|
|
Following HaMoked’s intervention: After an eight-month separation, a woman from the Gaza Strip and her children will be able to enter the West Bank for a week-long visit to reunite with the father
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Close but out of reach: the HCJ rejects HaMoked's petition to allow Israelis to visit their relatives in the Gaza Strip during the upcoming Muslim holiday of Id Al-Fitr. This is the fifth year in a row that Israel has been preventing its residents and citizens from visiting their relatives in Gaza during the holidays
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trapped inside her own country: the military prevents an 85 year old Palestinian widow from leaving the West Bank to Jordan to visit her children, for "security reasons"
|
|
|
|
|
Petition to HCJ | 5757/12 | 26.7.2012
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Petition to HCJ | 5649/12 | 22.7.2012
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
How ill must you be for the military to allow you to meet with your sister? Following HaMoked's petition, the military will allow a woman from the West Bank to visit her cancer-stricken sister in the Gaza Strip
|
|
|
|
|
Position Paper | 10.7.2012
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
HaMoked to the Prime Minister: Rescind government resolution banning family unification with Gaza Strip residents immediately
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
"Cardiac catheterization is not surgery": HCJ dismisses petition seeking a Palestinian be allowed to travel from Gaza to the West Bank to visit his brother who is recovering from a cardiac catheterization procedure. The HCJ ruled the case was not humanitarian
|
|
|
|
|
Military Legislation | 1698 | 7.6.2012
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Verdict / Supreme Court | 1912/12 | 6.6.2012
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Verdict / Supreme Court | 170/12 | 6.6.2012
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
HaMoked to GOC Southern Command: Renew holiday family visits to Gaza by Israelis in the coming Id al-Fitr
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Judgment in two general petitions filed by HaMoked: HCJ recommends broadening the criteria for “settlement” in the West Bank by Palestinians from the Gaza Strip and instructs the state to explain why it should not refrain from forcibly removing to Gaza Palestinians who moved to the West Bank before 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For three months, the military made no effort to respond to an administrative appeal against an exit ban prohibiting a West Bank tour guide from traveling abroad for his work: the "security ban" has been lifted following HaMoked's intercession
|
|
|
|
|
Verdict / Supreme Court | 2088/10 | 24.5.2012
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Criticism | 9961/03 | 20.5.2012 | Adv. Keren Michaeli
|
Criticism
In April 2011, the High Court of Justice (HCJ) ruled that the permit regime in effect with regards to Palestinians’ entry into the “seam zone” in the West Bank was lawful.[1] The “seam zone” is an enclave that was created as a result of the fact that the separation wall was built inside the Occupied Palestinian Territory (OPT). The enclave has trapped some 7,000 Palestinian residents and some ...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The HCJ has rejected the petition against the military's revision of the procedure for advance inquiry on exit bans: the court has ruled that the military's decision not to improve the procedure's efficiency, and to shift the burden of its flaws onto the Palestinian residents "is not outside the bounds of reasonableness"
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A military "solution": following HaMoked's petition to the HCJ, the military will consider allowing a Palestinian man who has not seen his wife and daughters for almost a decade, to meet them in Jordan on a six hour visit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The HCJ rejects HaMoked's petition: the justices base their decision on state claims against another man
|
|