|
|
|
Judgment / Supreme Court | 4853/20 | 10.8.2020
|
|
Defulat Text
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In a majority opinion, the High Court of Justice cancelled a punitive demolition order for the home of a family of nine, as “the principle of proportionality requires mitigation of the harm”: The military was allowed to consider a partial sealing of the home
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The HCJ cancelled the Regulation Law for legalizing expropriation of private lands in the West Bank: “The Law does not meet the test of proportionality and is therefore unconstitutional”
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the first time since 2016, the HCJ has cancelled a punitive order for the demolition of a West Bank home; HaMoked’s petition successfully saved a woman and her three young children from becoming homeless
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign Press, Hagar Shezaf & Netael Bandel | 25.5.2020
|
|
The army didn't issue the demolition order until five months after the attack, meaning it wouldn't serve as a deterrent, justice says
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
HaMoked to the military: initiate a thorough investigation into the excessive damage caused during the punitive demolition of a third floor apartment in the West Bank
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The High Court of Justice approved the punitive demolition of a home during the coronavirus pandemic: HaMoked calls on the military not to implement this judgment at this time, as it could put the lives of the occupants and others in danger
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
HaMoked to the military: suspend all aspects of the punitive home demolition policy; during the current corona pandemic, such illegal actions could endanger the lives of people
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
HCJ judgment distributed to the media before it was sent to HaMoked: President Hayut’s Office apologized for the “administration failure”
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The HCJ rejected HaMoked’s request for further hearing of the petition against the punitive demolition of a second-floor apartment in an eight-story residential building: No new precedent was set in the judgment regarding the demolition implementation manner
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
“According to the binding precedent”: the HCJ unanimously approved the punitive demolition of two West Bank homes of the innocent relatives of the suspects in a fatal attack
|
|
|
|
|
Petition to HCJ | 28.1.2020
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The HCJ approved the punitive demolition of four homes in the West Bank; Justice Baron in a minority opinion opposed demolition of three of the homes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Updated summary on punitive home demolitions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The High Court of Justice rejected two petitions by HaMoked against punitive home demolitions and sanctions the demolition of three apartments in the West Bank: Justice Karra in the minority holds that demolishing two apartments in the one case excessively harms innocent people
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The HCJ allows the punitive demolition of a home in the West Bank: Justice Mazuz in the minority reiterates his position that the policy of punitive demolitions raises difficult legal questions and that he was opposed to harming “uninvolved family members”
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The High Court rejected HaMoked’s request for a further hearing on the judgment allowing the demolition of the family home of a teenager accused of a stabbing attack: despite the unclarity regarding the minor’s motives, the home was demolished for “deterrence”
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In a majority opinion, the High Court allows the punitive demolition of the family home of a teenage assailant: doubts are raised in the judgment about the effectivity of home demolitions as a deterrent
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Another home demolished in the West Bank with HCJ approval: in the proceedings it was revealed that the assailant’s will referred to punitive demolitions as one of the motives for the attack
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Updated summary on punitive home demolitions from July 2014 to 20 September 2018
|
|